Re: Tidies binary relocation (issue 6463066)

[James]

On 19 Aug 2012, at 10:27, "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> wrote:
--
--

> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>
> To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
> Cc: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
> Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 7:29 PM
> Subject: Re: Tidies binary relocation (issue 6463066)
> 
> 
>> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 03:40:19PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: <address@hidden>
>>> To: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
>>> Cc: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
>>> 
>>> >I haven't looked at the new logic in detail, but exactly what was
>>> >LILYPOND_RELOCATE_PREFIX doing, and why do we no longer need it?  If
>>> 
>>> TBH, I have no idea.  It relies on an environment variable that has
>>> no mention in our docs anywhere, and the only reference I can find
>>> to it at all is an email message from 2006, where using it didn't
>>> fix the problem anyway.
>> 
>> That doesn't necessarily anything.  It could be used in GUB for
>> building, or lilypad-osx or lilypad-windows for compiling.  I must
>> admit that I've grepped for it in both git repositories and
>> couldn't find it, though.  It might even be involved in the
>> lilypond jail settings (i.e. for LSR).  (and note that unless you
>> have personally set up a working LSR, do not assume that the docs
>> on lilypond jail actually work!)
> 
> I did the same.  It's not just that it doean't appear anywhere in our build 
> system - it doesn't appear anywhere on t'internet, either.

Seriously? Peter Kay memes?

It's the future!

James