[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in guile?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Bug in guile? |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Aug 2012 09:49:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
"address@hidden" <address@hidden> writes:
> Hey all,
>
> Could someone well-versed in guile try running primitive-load-path on
> the attached file with and without the last line commented. Without
> the last line commented, on my machine, I get:
>
> guile> (primitive-load-path "/home/mikesol/pleasework.lyaux")
>
> Backtrace:
> In standard input:
> 1: 0* [primitive-load-path "/home/mikesol/pleasework.lyaux"]
>
> standard input:1:1: In procedure string->number in expression
> (primitive-load-path "/home/mikesol/pleasework.lyaux"):
> standard input:1:1: Value out of range: 461
>
> However, with the last line commented, everything works ok. This
> seems like a bug in Guile, but I wanna make sure that my input doesn't
> seem off before I report it to the list.
>
> Cheers,
> MS
>
>
> (define my-hash (make-hash-table 100))
> (hashq-set! my-hash
> ae7d8fe61e91281e447a9e8c354114387284e14a0b4f3af8f392e1c9a943bd837ffb863f0602af
> 7.45493)
Uh, you are aware _how_ one writes hexadecimal constants in Scheme?
They start with #x. I am surprised you should get an error only on the
last line.
The lack of an error might be worth investigating _if_ it is reproducible.
--
David Kastrup
- Bug in guile?, address@hidden, 2012/08/29
- Re: Bug in guile?,
David Kastrup <=