Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 2790 in lilypond: Patch: bar-line interface part 2/2

[John Mandereau]

Il giorno gio, 30/08/2012 alle 09.29 +0200, Marc Hohl ha scritto:
> Am 30.08.2012 06:46, schrieb address@hidden:
> >
> > Comment #6 on issue 2790 by address@hidden: Patch: bar-line 
> > interface part 2/2
> > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2790#c6
> >
> > Build results are available at
> >
> > http://grenouille.lilynet.net/patches-tests/2790/test-results
> >
> > 02:56:55 (UTC) Begin LilyPond compile, previous commit at 
> > ecf25f33aa4c02efda0694280e956c147f5006ae
> > 02:57:02 Another instance (PID 16669) is already running.
> > 03:27:19 Merged master, now at: ecf25f33aa4c02efda0694280e956c147f5006ae
> > 03:27:21     Success:        sudo -u lilybuild ./autogen.sh --noconfigure
> > 03:27:47     Success:        sudo -u lilybuild 
> > /home/lilybuild/master/configure --disable-optimising
> > 03:27:57     Success:        sudo -u lilybuild nice make clean
> > 03:43:41     Success:        sudo -u lilybuild nice make -j2 
> > CPU_COUNT=2 ANTI_ALIAS_FACTOR=1
> > 04:05:21     Success:        sudo -u lilybuild nice make test-baseline 
> > -j2 CPU_COUNT=2 ANTI_ALIAS_FACTOR=1
> >
> > 04:05:30 Issue 2790: Patch: bar-line interface part 2/2
> > 04:05:30 Issue 2790: Testing patch issue6498052_8001_diff
> > 04:05:31     Success:        sudo -u lilybuild git apply --index 
> > /home/jmandereau/lily-test-patches/issue6498052_8001.diff
> > 04:05:33     Success:        sudo -u lilybuild ./autogen.sh --noconfigure
> > 04:05:59     Success:        sudo -u lilybuild 
> > /home/lilybuild/master/configure --disable-optimising
> > 04:06:05     Success:        sudo -u lilybuild nice make clean
> > 04:21:50     Success:        sudo -u lilybuild nice make -j2 
> > CPU_COUNT=2 ANTI_ALIAS_FACTOR=1
> > 04:46:06     Success:        sudo -u lilybuild nice make check -j2 
> > CPU_COUNT=2 ANTI_ALIAS_FACTOR=1
> >
> >
> >
> I don't understand why grenouille finds a lot of differences for volta 
> brackets, whereas
> my test results show only some minor changes in bar-lines.ly and 
> bar-line-segno.ly (apart from
> output-distance.ly, of course).

I retested your patch (not the one you submitted yesterday afternoon,
but the one before), and found a lot of differences as well, which by
the way are very similar to the test results of last patch by James and
these by Grenouille.  If really you saw (or see again) only minor
changes in only two tests whereas test results from James or Grenouille
show a lot, could you double-check that you baselined with the correct
revision of the sources?

Best,
John