[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions
From: |
Graham Percival |
Subject: |
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:23:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Sep 02, 2012 at 12:58:47AM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> For what it's worth, i'm ok with this discussion (and similar ones)
> happening on devel, as long as we won't loose track of concrete
> proposals (when they will appear, ofc.).
I think the direction we're moving in is to have unstructured
discussions for a few days/weeks, then when there's an actual
concerete proposal, it goes lilypond-extra:gliss/gliss.texi. I'll
schedule those similar to GOP proposals, i.e. at least two weeks
of discussions after we have a fixed proposal.
During the "unstructured discussion" portion, I'm not taking
responsibility for keeping track of ideas. Unless there's a
volunteer for that, I suggest that whoever floats each idea keeps
track of how it progresses.
- Graham
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, (continued)
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Trevor Daniels, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Graham Percival, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Janek Warchoł, 2012/09/01
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions,
Graham Percival <=
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Keith OHara, 2012/09/02
- Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, David Kastrup, 2012/09/02
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2012/09/01
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Marc Hohl, 2012/09/01
Re: preliminary GLISS discussions, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2012/09/02