|
From: | Phil Holmes |
Subject: | Re: Minor release checklist |
Date: | Mon, 10 Sep 2012 16:51:51 +0100 |
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> Cc: "Devel" <address@hidden> Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 4:28 PM Subject: Re: Minor release checklist
Il giorno lun, 10/09/2012 alle 16.12 +0100, Phil Holmes ha scritto:Thanks, John. I'm following the CG to the letter, and type: git checkout origin/release/unstable
Working through this again - I've now got my local release/unstable branch, but the command above still puts me in detached head. I'm thinking it's a typo, and should be:
git checkout release/unstable
Strikes me we should not _require_ a release/unstable branch on the machine where the updates are being done.What's the problem with creating a new local branch to track a remote one? Creating branches is cheap, isn't it?
Just thought the most vanilla machine might be best, but I've got the new branch now.
--Phil Holmes
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |