[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GOP2-5 - GLISS discussions
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: GOP2-5 - GLISS discussions |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Sep 2012 09:33:14 +0200 (CEST) |
> The current format needs to have a one-to-one correspondance (or
> “bijection”) between ly and scheme. Graphically, the process is
> something like this:
>
> ly <--> scheme -> pdf/midi
I don't think that it is bijective. It's rather that anything in ly
should be able to be representable in Scheme and vice versa. This is
not the same. There might be multiple representations in Scheme, and
multiple representations in lilypond for exactly the same thing.
Werner
PS: I'm still not happy with a separate mailing list. But maybe we
should create a mailing list to discuss whether we want a new
mailing list.
Re: GOP2-5 - GLISS discussions, John Mandereau, 2012/09/19
Re: GOP2-5 - GLISS discussions, Ian Hulin, 2012/09/20