[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint
|
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
|
Subject: |
Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint |
|
Date: |
Sat, 15 Sep 2012 19:56:52 +0200 (CEST) |
> Distinguishing \f and \F while ignoring case is going to be a rather
> difficult operation. While I generally try to accommodate a lot of
> "make that work" requests, there are limits to what one can achieve
> when fighting not just the current code base, but rather plain
> logic.
:-)
Werner
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, (continued)
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, James, 2012/09/15
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/15
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Phil Holmes, 2012/09/15
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/15
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/15
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Janek WarchoĊ, 2012/09/17
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/17
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/18
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2012/09/18
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint, David Kastrup, 2012/09/15
- Re: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- allowing \f and \F (was: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint), Graham Percival, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F (was: [GLISS] - alternative viewpoint), Keith OHara, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Keith OHara, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, David Kastrup, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Werner LEMBERG, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, David Kastrup, 2012/09/15
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Graham Percival, 2012/09/22
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Sue Daniels, 2012/09/24
- Re: allowing \f and \F, Graham Percival, 2012/09/23