Re: Doc: Improve documentation of \glissando. (issue 6529043)

[thomasmorley65]

On 2012/09/20 18:08:15, Graham Percival wrote:
> We normally do not include \override in most sections of the Notation
manual.
> Instead, we ask users to submit LSR snippets showing the \override,
then we
> include those snippets in the docs.  This allows us to improve the
documentation
> with minimal effort on the part of developers.

> If there's a special reason to include \override directly, then we can
-- we do
> this when discussing automatic beaming, for example, because there's
no sense in
> mentioning this without having overrides.  But I'm not certain if this
applies
> in this case?

glissando-skip was introduced somewhere in 2.15.x, so no snippet using
it can make into LSR.
Thinking of an LSR-update, David recently suggested to wait a bit:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2012-09/msg00715.html




http://codereview.appspot.com/6529043/