[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 2
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 2 |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Oct 2012 22:44:51 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) |
Benkő Pál <address@hidden> writes:
>>>> The normal setting is to have four notes in a full 3/4 bar.
>>>
>>> That would be \times 3/4 rather than \times 6/4, right?
>>
>> Exactly.
>
> four quarters, yes; four eigths are 6/4, and that's what I've seen.
>
> regarding the \tuplet <integer> shorthand: I would hate "\tuplet n"
> meaning not "\tuplet n/1" but "\tuplet n/2" or something else
> (but that probably means only that I wouldn't use that shorthand).
Well, since it really is a "symbolic integer" rather than numeric, it
would feel appropriate to write this as
\tuplet3 { ... }
\tuplet2 { ... }
Of course, the absence of the space is purely a matter of writing style
here; it makes no semantic difference. But for _this_ usage pattern, it
feels like a somewhat natural choice.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 2, Keith OHara, 2012/10/06
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 2, Ian Hulin, 2012/10/07
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Keith OHara, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Francisco Vila, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, David Kastrup, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Francisco Vila, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Benkő Pál, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Francisco Vila, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, Reinhold Kainhofer, 2012/10/09
- Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3, David Kastrup, 2012/10/09