Re: [proposal] easy triplets and tuplets - Draft 3

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On 10/09/2012 01:12 AM, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:49:39PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
> > Absolutely!  Inverting the fraction for \tuplet was the original reason
> > for inventing it, IIRC.
>
> Woah, really?  I thought the whole point was to avoid the
> confusion between \time and \times.  I think it would be
> extremely confusing for "\tuplet x/y" to mean the same thing as
> "\times y/x".

Aren't they both good reasons?  You get to avoid too-similar command names, 
_and_ you get a syntax that matches more closely to the musical notation.  Seems 
like a win on both counts.