[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece
From: |
David Nalesnik |
Subject: |
Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Oct 2012 07:51:36 -0500 |
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 6:39 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Surely this points to the pop operation in \override as being at
>> fault? If \override was simply push, rather than pop-push then the
>> code above would seem to work as intended.
>
> Sure. The idea presumably was not to have stack buildup from things
> like
>
> \voiceOne c c \voiceTwo d d \voiceThree c c
>
Buildup of unwanted data or no, it would be useful to be able to write
something like
\toLast Accidental #'color
to restore the previous override
and \revert to restore the defaults
-David
- Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece, (continued)
Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece, Benkő Pál, 2012/10/13
Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece, Trevor Daniels, 2012/10/13
- Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece, David Kastrup, 2012/10/13
- Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece,
David Nalesnik <=
- Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece, David Kastrup, 2012/10/13
- Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece, David Nalesnik, 2012/10/13
- Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece, David Kastrup, 2012/10/13
- Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece, David Nalesnik, 2012/10/13
- Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece, David Kastrup, 2012/10/13
Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece, Janek Warchoł, 2012/10/13