Re: Naming _another_ lacking puzzle piece

[David Kastrup]

"Trevor Daniels" <address@hidden> writes:

> James, you wrote Sunday, October 14, 2012 12:05 AM
>
>> I have a patch coming that is trying to at least document \single
>> \hide and \omit.
>
> Fine - \hide and \omit are quite straightforward.
>  
>> i also have started to use \single to take the opportunity to better
>> organize NR 5.3.
>
> Hhm.  This section will need quite a major change once the discussion 
> about \temporary, pop/push, etc has come to a conclusion.  Might be 
> better to wait a while.

If the goal is to never have to write things more than once, the safest
way is to wait forever.

And "I find myself unable to document _this_ in a comprehensible
manner", of course, is valid input for design decisions as well.

-- 
David Kastrup