lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2.16.1


From: Phil Holmes
Subject: Re: 2.16.1
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 11:17:16 -0000

----- Original Message ----- From: "Graham Percival" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>; "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 6:32 PM
Subject: Re: 2.16.1


On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 06:02:04PM -0000, Phil Holmes wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2012 5:36 PM
Subject: Re: 2.16.1


>>I've just built 2.16.1 and will be uploading it later this evening.
>>All seems OK except I tried to create a regtest comparison versus
>>2.16.0 and instead got a comparison of 2.17.6 versus 2.16.0.
>
>But you are certain that the binary itself is 2.16.1?  How would it
>produce a comparison of 2.17.6?

The binary is certainly named as 2.16.1 so I've no doubt that it is
2.16.1 - it was also built from stable/2.16 and there's not 2.17.6
code there.  I'm assuming that VERSION has 2.17.6 unstable, and it
does a regtest comparison with the highest numbered release - or at
least says it does.  I don't think this is likely to be more than an
oddity.

Regtests are built from the just-compiled binaries to any regtest
tarballs you have in regtests/ .  You evidently had a
regtest/lilypond-2.16.0-test.tar.gz and -2.17.6-test- tarballs in
that directory.  Each tarball contains various .eps and/or
"signature" files which are used to produce the comparisons.  See
the code for more details because about what's in the regtest
tarballs and how they're used, because I'm not clear on it.

- Graham


From my experience, that's not exactly what happens. As you say, the build
creates a comparison of regtests built against the current binary with any tarball in the regtests/ directory. For me, this was only 2.16.0 - I was careful to ensure this. We would then expect this output to be put in a 2.16.1 directory and labelled 2.16.1. What happened in practice was that the output was put in a 2.17.6 directory. This then killed the upload later on in the evening, since it could not find the 2.16.1 directory. I renamed it and restarted the upload, which appeared to finish correctly. I'm now going to update VERSION and hope the website updates during the day.

--
Phil Holmes



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]