[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doc: Clarify documentation of footnotes (2971) (issue 6845078)
From: |
tdanielsmusic |
Subject: |
Re: Doc: Clarify documentation of footnotes (2971) (issue 6845078) |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Dec 2012 23:04:16 +0000 |
On 2012/12/11 17:43:26, dak wrote:
At the time this text was written originally, grob-name was pretty
accurate.
But now we probably should call it something like "grob-spec" (or
whatever we
use for overrides) instead: if you want to put a footnote on a time
signature,
Good call. I'll modify the text and syntax definition.
So we should at least give one example including a context name.
There already is an example of modifying a TimeSignature,
BarLine and KeySignature, all at the Staff level.
Trevor
https://codereview.appspot.com/6845078/