|
She says the bracket can be extended to the
rhythmical position that the tuplet conceptually ends on, even if there's no
note there. However, it seems to me that the example David gave is wrong
musically. It should be [ crochet quaver ] [ quaver crochet ] to allow the
brackets to be placed where they lie musically.
--
Phil Holmes
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, January 12, 2013 11:23
AM
Subject: Re: How should
tupletSpannerDuration actually work?
Phil,
On 12 January 2013 11:20, Phil Holmes <address@hidden> wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
To: <address@hidden>
Sent: Saturday, January 12,
2013 10:25 AM
Subject: How should tupletSpannerDuration actually work?
I have a hard time considering the output
of
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\version "2.16.0"
\relative c' {
\set
tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment 1 2)
\times 2/3 { c8 d e
f g a g f e d c d }
\set tupletSpannerDuration = #(ly:make-moment
1 4)
\times 2/3 { c4 d e f g a g f e d c d
}
}
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
useful:
I think that looks
OK? It can't put correct triplet brackets over the crochets because
the triplets are 1.5 crochets long. What do you think is
wrong?
Does Mrs G in her book cover single note tuplet signifiers?
I might expect for instance that a tuplet in this case _would_ have 'a
bracket' but with the tupelet over the top of it rather than in between
it.
James
|