[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Allows slurs to break at barlines. (issue 7424049)
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: Allows slurs to break at barlines. (issue 7424049) |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Mar 2013 08:55:31 -0000 |
address@hidden wrote Monday, March 25, 2013 7:29 AM
> On 25 mars 2013, at 07:10, address@hidden wrote:
>
>> Conceptually, of course, there *are* two pieces. The other piece is
>> probably at the other end of the repeat. The automatic behavior is quite
>> good, so fortunately we will rarely need to look up whatever name the
>> committee approves for the command to make a broken slur.
>
> It'd be a shame for this to get stuck in the pipes because we can't figure
> out a good name. I am indifferent and I don't mind \broken or whatever
> really.
Yes, let's move this on now.
If we want the name to apply to the slur as a whole then \broken or \split look
good. I'd be happy with that.
But as the function is being applied to an end point of a slur, not the whole
slur, I actually prefer "\free(" and "\free)", to be vocalised as "free opening
slur" and "free closing slur", or possibly \floating.
But I'll accept anything now to move this on :)
Trevor
Re: Allows slurs to break at barlines. (issue 7424049), dak, 2013/03/20
Re: Allows slurs to break at barlines. (issue 7424049), k-ohara5a5a, 2013/03/25
Re: Allows slurs to break at barlines. (issue 7424049), k-ohara5a5a, 2013/03/26
Re: Allows slurs to break at barlines. (issue 7424049), janek . lilypond, 2013/03/27