|
From: | Keith OHara |
Subject: | Re: Add changes entry for Mike's work on skylines. (issue 8613043) |
Date: | Tue, 16 Apr 2013 18:02:52 -0700 |
User-agent: | Opera Mail/12.14 (Win32) |
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 12:15:23 -0700, address@hidden <address@hidden> wrote:
On 16 avr. 2013, at 22:12, address@hidden wrote:"Wrong placement"? Seriously? Can you give any articulation where you'd get bad behavior for considering just its bounding box?f4->-. In the bad old days, the staccato was spaced too far from the accent.
{f'4->-. \once\override Script #'skyline-horizontal-padding = #0.2 %{ for a fiddler withold eyes %} f'4->-. \once\override Script #'vertical-skylines = #'() %{ just use boxes %} f'4->-. } That is subtle. We do have individual properties for each type of script, in scm/scripts.scm. The downbow and similar could get skyline-horizontal-padding, leaving it zero for the > accent. On the other hand, the special thing about > accents is not that we want other scripts to sidle up alongside, but rather that objects can come close to its straight lines and still remain visually clear. More appropriate to reduce the individually-defined padding in for "accent" in scripts.scm.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |