[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: potential version 2.18 is looking good

From: Janek Warchoł
Subject: Re: potential version 2.18 is looking good
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 09:35:36 +0200

Hi Keith,

sorry for not responding earlier.
Many thanks for this comparison - i think it is very useful!  Doing
such comparisons is very important for LilyPond in my opinion.
Maybe you'd like to turn this into a short blog post?  I think that it
would fit well with the focus of

And i agree that the output of the current dev version is looking good.


2013/5/29 Keith OHara <address@hidden>:
> A different score is at <> chosen to show
> off the improvements made since version 2.16 (even the skyline-spacing of
> text that I tried to throw out) and with source that complies both with
> version 2.16 and current (which took some effort).
> There are workarounds in the source, but only for known bugs in both
> versions.
> Maybe we want to give naturals on sixths just a bit of separation, but there
> is an easy plan for that noted at the end of tracker issue 2141
> There are some accidentals getting too close to rests (which can be resolved
> with pitched rests). I noted on the tracker that issue 472 has come back in
> some cases.
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]