Re: potential version 2.18 is looking good

[Janek Warchoł]

Hi Keith,

sorry for not responding earlier.
Many thanks for this comparison - i think it is very useful!  Doing
such comparisons is very important for LilyPond in my opinion.
Maybe you'd like to turn this into a short blog post?  I think that it
would fit well with the focus of lilypondblog.wordpress.com.

And i agree that the output of the current dev version is looking good.

best,
Janek

2013/5/29 Keith OHara <address@hidden>:
> A different score is at <http://k-ohara.oco.net/Lilypond/> chosen to show
> off the improvements made since version 2.16 (even the skyline-spacing of
> text that I tried to throw out) and with source that complies both with
> version 2.16 and current (which took some effort).
>
> There are workarounds in the source, but only for known bugs in both
> versions.
>
> Maybe we want to give naturals on sixths just a bit of separation, but there
> is an easy plan for that noted at the end of tracker issue 2141
>
> There are some accidentals getting too close to rests (which can be resolved
> with pitched rests). I noted on the tracker that issue 472 has come back in
> some cases.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel