[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Updates to NR sections 3 and 4 (issue 10782045)
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Updates to NR sections 3 and 4 (issue 10782045) |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Jun 2013 12:30:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>>>> https://codereview.appspot.com/10782045/
>>>
>>> I think it might actually be worth a comment to that effect with this
>>> example? "Note where the \relative statement is placed..."
>>
>> Don't think so. Notation manual is a reference manual. Information
>> like that belongs to \relative. It would be a different matter in the
>> Learning Manual.
>
>
> Seems relevant to tagging, too?
That's why the section with tagging already contains
Known issues and warnings
Calling \relative on a music expression obtained by filtering music
through \keepWithTag or \removeWithTag might cause the octave relations
to change, as only the pitches actually remaining in the filtered
expression will be considered. Applying \relative first, before
\keepWithTag or \removeWithTag, avoids this danger as \relative then
acts on all the pitches as-input.
--
David Kastrup
Re: Updates to NR sections 3 and 4 (issue 10782045), dak, 2013/06/30
Re: Updates to NR sections 3 and 4 (issue 10782045), markpolesky, 2013/06/30