lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Updates to NR sections 3 and 4 (issue 10782045)


From: Phil Holmes
Subject: Re: Updates to NR sections 3 and 4 (issue 10782045)
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 11:43:56 +0100

----- Original Message ----- From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>; <address@hidden>
Sent: Sunday, June 30, 2013 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: Updates to NR sections 3 and 4 (issue 10782045)


"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:

https://codereview.appspot.com/10782045/

I think it might actually be worth a comment to that effect with this
example?  "Note where the \relative statement is placed..."

Don't think so.  Notation manual is a reference manual.  Information
like that belongs to \relative.  It would be a different matter in the
Learning Manual.


Seems relevant to tagging, too?

That's why the section with tagging already contains

   Known issues and warnings

   Calling \relative on a music expression obtained by filtering music
   through \keepWithTag or \removeWithTag might cause the octave relations
   to change, as only the pitches actually remaining in the filtered
   expression will be considered. Applying \relative first, before
   \keepWithTag or \removeWithTag, avoids this danger as \relative then
   acts on all the pitches as-input.


It's a fair cop.

--
Phil Holmes



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]