Re: 2.17.26 regression tests

[David Kastrup]

Keith OHara <address@hidden> writes:

> David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
>> You make it sound as if issue 2910 will warrant a bunch of fine-tuning
>> before the results can be called production-ready.  
>
> No, the stencil-integral patch had changed the meaning of a padding,
> we started started fine-tuning the defaults in response, then the
> patch for 2910 restored the old meaning and backed out the fine-tuning,
> so we are now closer to the last stable.
>
> The text over 'accidental-ancient.ly' went back to the layout it had
> in 2.16.  I made noise about places where I think things are too close,
> and forced a silly example into the Changes entry, but people seem
> satisfied with the output, so I am as well.
>
>> "Keith OHara" <k-ohara5a5a <at> oco.net> writes:
>> 
>> > We have a release with no known regressions.
>
> I did forget the \hspace thing from issue 3504.
>
> The other tracked items marked regression are some documentation items to
> catch up, but those are in progress.

Sounds good.

-- 
David Kastrup