lilypond-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Failed 'make' with 2.17.27 from tarball


From: Thomas Morley
Subject: Re: Failed 'make' with 2.17.27 from tarball
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 01:50:58 +0200

2013/9/30 Phil Holmes <address@hidden>:
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Thomas Morley"
> <address@hidden>
> To: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "lilypond-devel" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 12:15 PM
> Subject: Re: Failed 'make' with 2.17.27 from tarball
>
>
>
>> 2013/9/30 David Kastrup <address@hidden>:
>>>
>>> David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> Not necessary, that's quite sufficient.  I should be able to reproduce
>>>> this, I guess.  I have no problems _without_ a separate build
>>>> directory.  Now trying with one.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, it bombs.  So we managed to distribute a setup that will refrain
>>> from building ly-grammar.txt in a separate build directory.
>>>
>>> Rerunning make will regenerate parser.cc and parser.hh and then
>>> recompile from there (first time around) (Huh?).
>>>
>>> But the grammar file will remain missing.  Deleting
>>> ../Documentation/out/ly-grammar.txt will not help, so while my including
>>> it in the distribution did nothing for a build with a separate build
>>> directory, it also does not seem to be what is causing the problem.
>>>
>>> Can we bisect this somehow, assuming that 2.17.26 worked?
>>>
>>> --
>>> David Kastrup
>>
>>
>> If I find a 2.17.26-tarball I could test with it this evening (off for
>> work now)
>> Compiling 2.17.25 from tarball definitly worked.
>>
>> -Harm
>
>
> It's on the Savannah site:
>
> http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/lilypond.git/
>
> --
> Phil Holmes

FWIW, compiling 2.17.26 from the tarball, using a separate
build-directory works fine.

-Harm



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]