[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Black mensural notehead bug
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Black mensural notehead bug |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Oct 2013 19:18:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
> To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "Devel" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 5:37 PM
> Subject: Re: Black mensural notehead bug
>
>
>> "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> This looks wrong to me:
>>>
>>> \relative c'' {
>>> \override NoteHead.style = #'mensural
>>> \cadenzaOn
>>> s1 a \longa a \breve a1 \bar "|"
>>> \override NoteHead.style = #'blackmensural
>>> s1 a \longa a \breve a1 \bar "|"
>>> }
>>
>> There is no blackmensural style as such as far as I can see. Do you
>> mean blackpetrucci?
>
> There are glyphs - for example noteheads.sM1blackmensural so I guessed
> the style.
Guessing is your privilege, but as long as you don't guess something
supported by the manuals, I don't see anything that can be called a bug.
> It seems to me you shouldn't need to select a petrucci style to get
> these glyphs?
Petrucci uses mensural noteheads scaled to a different size. So it's
not that surprising that Blackpetrucci uses blackmensural noteheads.
So we have any other style using _those_ noteheads?
--
David Kastrup