|
From: | Joseph Rushton Wakeling |
Subject: | Re: improving our workflow with better tools - let's test things. |
Date: | Sun, 20 Oct 2013 19:39:34 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0 |
On 20/10/13 11:15, James wrote:
Yes, although I don't want to be considered arrogant that it should only be 'acceptable to me'; but when the last Patch-nanny decided he was going 'spend more time with his family' (so to speak speaking) and wanted to pass on the role to someone else, the silence from the LilyPond community was deafening. I know that real developers would pitch in if need be, but it has taken me away from doing documentation patches - my original role - as I simply do not have time to do this and any documentation that is of any significant size or that may require a lot of back-and-forth as we polish and refine some explanatory section that needs an overhaul.
You may want to take a look at: https://gitlab.com/lilypond/lilylibrary/merge_requests/1I submitted a trial merge request just so we could all explore the experience of reviewing a proposed change to the library. It's as near the GitHub experience as makes almost no difference (although there are a couple of tiny ways in which it seems to be different -- the most obvious is that there's no preview functionality for comments, which is cosmetic but still annoying).
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |