[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: xpdf situation with Ubuntu?
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: xpdf situation with Ubuntu? |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Oct 2013 09:43:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
James <address@hidden> writes:
> Hello,
>
>
> On 22 October 2013 07:51, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> James <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > XPDF in Ubuntu 10.04 - my lilydev at home works. version 3.0.2
>> >
>> > xpdf in Linux Mint 15 (Olivia) whatever that is the Ubuntu Equiv (it's
>> not
>> > the Debian one) crashes - I think that is 13.04. Version 3.0.3.
>>
>> Do you keep it updated? Do _they_ keep it updated?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
> Well it doesn't come installed by default so I had to sudo apt-get install
> it. So that is as current as it comes in the repos.
>
> The answer is there for No and Yes - as
> http://www.foolabs.com/xpdf/download.html seems to be the most current
> version there is.
The problem is not whether Xpdf is 3.03. The Debian/Ubuntu versions
have had the "xpdf" library surgically removed into the "Poppler"
library which is maintained somewhat differently. The reasons for the
crashes are not a problem with upstream Xpdf, but divergences of the
Poppler APIs. So there are working as well as broken adaptations of
Xpdf in Debian/Ubuntu.
> I noticed that a few things were also installed, here is a snip of the
> History.log from my apt log from Linux Mint.
>
> --snip--
> Start-Date: 2013-10-22 07:05:05
> Commandline: apt-get install xpdf
> Install: lesstif2:amd64 (0.95.2-1.1, automatic), xpdf:amd64
> (3.03-10ubuntu1), gsfonts-x11:amd64 (0.22, automatic)
3.03-10ubuntu1 was a broken version IIRC. Looking at
<URL:https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xpdf>, this seems to be the
"current" version for Raring Ringtail. Ugh.
If you take a look at
<URL:https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xpdf/+bug/943195>, you'll
notice that Dmitry uploaded a backport for Raring to his respective
PPA. Would it be feasible to check that out, and if it works, report
enthusiastically to the bug report? Or so...
--
David Kastrup