On Nov 3, 2013, at 1:50 PM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
Mike Solomon <address@hidden> writes:
Apple’s home cooked clang is not free software, so there’s no reason to expect free software to compile with it.
Non sequitur. There is nothing wrong with trying to bring some more taste of free software to people in the Apple jails. Now there are alternative means, so it's not high urgency. In particular, if you are the only person we've heard of so far and already moved to an alternative: we run into danger of putting in a lot of work for purely imaginary users.
It took me 15 minutes of work to compile with g++. I can’t imagine that anyone who knows what they’re doing (TM) won’t be able to figure this out in a reasonable timeframe unless they have a seriously messed up computer.
I don’t mind giving up on it.
Shrug. At any rate, it would be important to get some feedback regarding installation of the stock LilyPond binary distribution on the newest OSX. It would be good if that worked before we put out 2.18.
Cheers, MS
|