[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?
From: |
Keith OHara |
Subject: |
Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ? |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:36:47 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Opera Mail/12.16 (Win32) |
On Mon, 25 Nov 2013 00:10:08 -0800, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
"Keith OHara" <address@hidden> writes:
I timed one big score, Movement 1 of
<http://www.mutopiaproject.org/cgibin/piece-info.cgi?id=1793>
2.16.2 2.17.95
WinXP 2m 30s 5m 10s
Fedora 1m 50s 1m 50s
Have you used the GUB-compiled binary package, or Fedora's built-in or a
self-compiled package? I think that you probably can only make
platform-specific comparisons if you use GUB for all.
GUB-compiled packages in all cases give the same results as above.
Most of the increase in time to set this score happened between 2.17.0 and .1
2.16.2 2m 30s
2.17.0 2m 28s
2.17.1 4m 06s
so it is probably the issue 2148 patch, use of outlines instead of boxes for
layout.
I did speed-test that patch, but under Linux. Maybe the system calls to the
font server, to get outlines for the glyphs, take longer under Windows.
- Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?,
Keith OHara <=
- Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?, Mike Solomon, 2013/12/10
- Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?, David Kastrup, 2013/12/10
- Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?, Mike Solomon, 2013/12/10
- Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/12/10
- Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?, Phil Holmes, 2013/12/10
- Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?, Keith OHara, 2013/12/10
- Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?, Keith OHara, 2013/12/10
- Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?, David Kastrup, 2013/12/10
- Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?, Keith OHara, 2013/12/11
- Re: anyone notice speed of 2.17.95 on Windows ?, David Kastrup, 2013/12/11