Re: Website questions: GSoC

[Urs Liska]

Am 12.12.2013 16:51, schrieb David Kastrup:
> Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Am 12.12.2013 16:39, schrieb Paul Morris:
> > > Urs Liska wrote
> > > > Am 12.12.2013 14:10, schrieb Mike Solomon:
> > > > > On Dec 12, 2013, at 3:06 PM, Urs Liska &lt;
> > > > ul@
> > > > &gt; wrote:
> > > > > > The page "GSoC 2012" is obviously outdated.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What should be done with it?
> > > What about just changing it to "GSoC" (dropping the "2012") and make it a
> > > general GSoC page.  Assuming we're still interested in attracting future
> > > "GSoCoders," having this page shows our interest, our past participation,
> > > and some examples of what future projects might look like.
> > Sounds good.
> > Could be made into sth like: "These are some ideas. Maybe you're
> > interested in such a project?"
> > What would be the basic requirement to apply for/participate in a
> > future GSoC?
> >
> > > Janek's GSoC work can legitimately be presented in a positive light: "he
> > > learned a lot, the task turned out to be more involved than was first
> > > thought, but he is still working on finishing it and is still actively
> > > contributing to the project in other ways as well" etc.
> > If we turn it into a generic GSoC page that's certainly possible.
> I'd let the topic of the last GSoC rest until there are more tangible
> followup results.
What do you exactly mean by that? Leaving the page as it is currently?
Or removing the page completely?
I can't tell what you suggest.