Re: regtest for new glyphs necessary?

[Marc Hohl]

Am 03.01.2014 08:03, schrieb Keith OHara:
> Marc Hohl <marc <at> hohlart.de> writes:
>
> > I am about to upload a patch for these four glyphs within the next
> > days, but I wanted to ask whether a new (or enhanced existing)
> > regtest is necessary for this type of enhancement?
>
> They could conceivably be broken accidentally, by a mistaken change
> to our .mf files or a metafont bug, so a regression test is useful.
> LilyPond probably has too many tests, but you could add to 'clefs.ly'

Ok, thanks for the tip.

I rearranged clefs.ly so that both normal-sized and smaller clefs
are covered by the regtest, I hope that this is ok.

http://codereview.appspot.com/47840043

Marc