Re: 3.0?

[Urs Liska]

David Kastrup <address@hidden> schrieb:
>Joseph Rushton Wakeling <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On 09/01/14 12:20, David Kastrup wrote:
>>> Another problem is that LilyPond has a usage philosophy and workflow
>>> that strongly penalizes manual tweaks.  Graphically/manually
>oriented
>>> workflows detract from the importance of getting good default
>>> typesetting.
>>
>> I'm not sure that's necessarily the case.  Making it easy to
>> experiment with manual tweaks could be a very good way of working out
>> how things need to be engraved, and thus provide guidance for better
>> automated typesetting.
>
>That must be the reason why the typical Word document features the
>consistent use of document styles for arriving at typographically
>superior results.

LOL!


-- 
Urs Liska
openlilylib.org