Re: [SPAM] Re: Test Ponding tweets

[Phil Holmes]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Urs Liska" <address@hidden>
To: "Phil Holmes" <address@hidden>; "LilyPond Development Team" 
<address@hidden>
Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: [SPAM] Re: Test Ponding tweets


> Am 02.05.2014 17:31, schrieb Phil Holmes:
> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Urs Liska" <address@hidden>
> > To: "LilyPond Development Team" <address@hidden>
> > Sent: Friday, May 02, 2014 4:12 PM
> > Subject: Test Ponding tweets
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > is there a convenient way to check a new ponding for correct syntax?
> > > If I'm not mistaken a local website build won't show me the result of
> > > a ponding, isn't it?
> > >
> > > So what to do with a ponding patch? Simply try to mimick the existing
> > > ones and hope the patch will pass? Rather not, isn't it?
> > >
> > > TIA
> > > Usr
> >
> >
> > My understanding is that the tweet must simply be well-formed HTML: so
> > if you can read it in an HTML editor, it should be good to go.
>
> Not really. All the tags (i.e. the angled brackets) are displayed 
> explicitly if I open the file in a browser.


Good point.  It looks like a possibility for testing would be to open the 
file in a browser, and then use the displayed text as HTML in an editor, and 
open _that_ file.

--
Phil Holmes