[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: GUB fail with smob templates

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: GUB fail with smob templates
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 17:50:06 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux)

David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

> Phil Holmes <address@hidden> writes:
>> GUB failed today with the following errors:
>> /home/gub/gub/target/darwin-ppc/src/
>> release-unstable/lily/include/unpure-pure-container.hh: In static member 
>> function 'static scm_unused_struct* Unpure_pure_container::make_smob
>> (scm_unused_struct*, scm_unused_struct*)':
>> /home/gub/gub/target/darwin-ppc/src/
>> release-unstable/lily/include/unpure-pure-container.hh:39: 
>> error: 'template<class Super> class Smob2' used without template parameters
>> /home/gub/gub/target/darwin-ppc/src/
>> release-unstable/lily/include/unpure-pure-container.hh:40: 
>> error: 'template<class Super> class Smob2' used without template parameters
>> I assume this is 
> The actually flagged code is in issue 4086 instead, though 4086 heavily
> depends on 4082.
>> but it's way over my head to know what the problem is.
> Possibly an older gcc version.  Are these the only errors?  In a
> parallel build, one would expect to run across several errors in
> different files before compilation bombs out.  Would be good to know
> and/or have some further complaints to look at.
> I'll try brooding over the error messages and see whether they suggest
> some syntax that might be more palatable to older gcc versions.

Pushed a matching fix.  It does not appear that this particular problem
is coded elsewhere.  I think that the compiler complaint might be
correct even though my newer GCC variant does not bother mentioning it.

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]