[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Doc: LM - correct @example for Tweak Command (issue 140630043 by add

From: pkx166h
Subject: Re: Doc: LM - correct @example for Tweak Command (issue 140630043 by address@hidden)
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 07:24:33 +0000

Created new issue for the general address@hidden vs @var{variable}
File Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely (right):
Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely:453: \tweak
@address@hidden address@hidden
On 2014/09/15 07:26:45, dak wrote:
The Google issue pointed out that this should be "LayoutObject" to
reflect the
proper case.


It is somewhat disconcerting that the Info page rendition (rather
than the HTML pages) will read LAYOUTOBJECT and LAYOUT-PROPERTY
anyway, as
that's the way @var placeholders are formatted.  Still, I think
that's probably
the best we can do.

You put in address@hidden instead of @var{value}.  I think we are not
consistent regarding that, but it is worth mentioning that something
like (see
Learning Manual in Tweaks)

\override TextSpanner.bound-details.left.text
     = \markup { \small \bold Slower }

(can also be used as a tweak) gets along perfectly fine without a #
sign, so the
# is really an integral part of @var{value} and not part of the \tweak

As per Trevor's suggestion I'll make a new tracker for dealing with the
inconsistencies in the doc.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]