Re: Doc: LM - correct @example for Tweak Command (issue 140630043 by address@hidden)

[pkx166h]

Created new issue for the general address@hidden vs @var{variable}
discussion.

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4105


https://codereview.appspot.com/140630043/diff/1/Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely
File Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/140630043/diff/1/Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely#newcode453
Documentation/learning/tweaks.itely:453: \tweak
@address@hidden address@hidden
On 2014/09/15 07:26:45, dak wrote:
> The Google issue pointed out that this should be "LayoutObject" to
reflect the
> proper case.

Done.

> It is somewhat disconcerting that the Info page rendition (rather
> than the HTML pages) will read LAYOUTOBJECT and LAYOUT-PROPERTY
anyway, as
> that's the way @var placeholders are formatted.  Still, I think
that's probably
> the best we can do.

> You put in address@hidden instead of @var{value}.  I think we are not
overly
> consistent regarding that, but it is worth mentioning that something
like (see
> Learning Manual in Tweaks)

> \override TextSpanner.bound-details.left.text
>      = \markup { \small \bold Slower }

> (can also be used as a tweak) gets along perfectly fine without a #
sign, so the
> # is really an integral part of @var{value} and not part of the \tweak
syntax.

As per Trevor's suggestion I'll make a new tracker for dealing with the
inconsistencies in the doc.

https://codereview.appspot.com/140630043/