[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ready lilypond-mode for packaging for emacs 24 package system, such
From: |
dak |
Subject: |
Re: Ready lilypond-mode for packaging for emacs 24 package system, such that lilypond-mode will work wi… (issue 191260043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Dec 2014 16:21:25 +0000 |
On 2014/12/29 15:39:40, pschmied wrote:
Hi all,
Is there something that I need to do at this point in the system? I
see the
comment about the unnecessary `progn` in the code. Should I nix that
and
resubmit?
The progn is a style issue but not a show stopper. However,
unconditionally enabling font-lock-mode is inappropriate for a mode:
this should be fixed and resubmitted, and while you are at it, removing
the progn seems reasonable.
It has the advantage of getting back at the original indentation and
thus a smaller diff.
Incidentally, it would seem that you have pulled the kill-buffer inside
of the while loop, a really bad idea. Without the progn, you'd likely
have noticed this change.
https://codereview.appspot.com/191260043/
- Ready lilypond-mode for packaging for emacs 24 package system, such that lilypond-mode will work wi… (issue 191260043 by address@hidden), peter, 2014/12/23
- Re: Ready lilypond-mode for packaging for emacs 24 package system, such that lilypond-mode will work wi… (issue 191260043 by address@hidden), pkx166h, 2014/12/26
- Re: Ready lilypond-mode for packaging for emacs 24 package system, such that lilypond-mode will work wi… (issue 191260043 by address@hidden), dak, 2014/12/26
- Re: Ready lilypond-mode for packaging for emacs 24 package system, such that lilypond-mode will work wi… (issue 191260043 by address@hidden), dak, 2014/12/29
- Re: Ready lilypond-mode for packaging for emacs 24 package system, such that lilypond-mode will work wi… (issue 191260043 by address@hidden),
dak <=