Re: Allow independent adjustment of minimum length for spanner siblings (issue 201140043 by address@hidden)

[thomasmorley65]

https://codereview.appspot.com/201140043/diff/1/input/regression/minimum-length-after-break.ly
File input/regression/minimum-length-after-break.ly (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/201140043/diff/1/input/regression/minimum-length-after-break.ly#newcode15
input/regression/minimum-length-after-break.ly:15: \override
Tie.minimum-length-after-break = 20
On 2015/02/05 22:51:06, david.nalesnik wrote:
> On 2015/02/05 22:31:33, thomasmorley651 wrote:
> > I'd use \once \override ...
> > Though, that's only me

> I'm happy to change that.  Would you use \once with the other
overrides in the
> file?

I'd always use \once. But again, it's only me, what do others think?

https://codereview.appspot.com/201140043/diff/1/input/regression/minimum-length-after-break.ly#newcode16
input/regression/minimum-length-after-break.ly:16: a1~
On 2015/02/05 22:51:06, david.nalesnik wrote:
> On 2015/02/05 22:31:34, thomasmorley651 wrote:
> > I assume it works for chords as well.
> > I'd add at least one example with chords and Tie or Glissando

> Instead of the one regtest, I could have two.

> The first would show a tied chord, and I would show how you can use
> 'minimum-length and 'minimum-length-after-break in various
combinations.

> The second would be this regtest, and I could take out the tie example
so
> there's no overlap with the other test.

> What do you think?

I can't see an advantage in having two regtests. I'd prefer to extend
this one.

https://codereview.appspot.com/201140043/