Re: Remove redundant (and) in ly/init.ly (issue 209320043 by address@hidden)

[Urs Liska]

OK, thanks for the explanation.
But after all these lines one more with a conclusion wouldn't have hurt, 
isn't is?
Did you want to say the patch should be discarded?

Am 06.03.2015 11:55, schrieb address@hidden:
> On 2015/03/06 10:45:14, uliska wrote:
> > See discussion here:
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2015-03/msg00180.html
>
> The point of this construct is that you can just edit the #t to be #f if
> you want to disable the functionality.  The discussion apparently only
> centers around whether this serves a non-trivial programmatic purpose.
>
> It is similar to occurences of
>
> #if 0
> ...
> ...
> #endif
>
> in C code.  Of course, you can trivially replace this with something
> simpler manually without changing the net effect.  That's not the point.
>  The point is that it's easy to change to the opposite behavior, and
> that it is something that is half-advertised as something to play with.
>
> https://codereview.appspot.com/209320043/
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel


--
Urs Liska
address@hidden