[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Assessment of Allura at SourceForge
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
Subject: |
Re: Assessment of Allura at SourceForge |
Date: |
Fri, 22 May 2015 17:43:14 +0100 |
Hi Federico
you wrote Friday, May 22, 2015 12:17 PM
> The import script will work if you install Allura on your computer?
> It may be easier to test and import locally and then update to the
> server we eventually decide to use.
I see you're trying this. Looks like it takes pretty well as long.
> The labels field just allows to sort alphabetically. It would be
> possible to show a list of the labels, as in the Status field?
No. The Labels field is free text so there is no specific list,
unlike the Status field.
> I find the search syntax uneasy. For example, to add a keyword to one
> of your saved search I learned after two fails that I should have
> inserted AND before the keyword:
>
> _type:Documentation AND (status:New OR status:Accepted OR
> status:Started) AND partcombine
I'm still uncomfortable with it too.
> The same search could be (in github for example):
> is:open is:issue label:Documentation partcombine
>
> No capital letters, no parentheses, no redundant stuff.
That looks worth trying, so I did:
Error running search query: [Reason: undefined field is]
I'll play a little more later tonight.
Trevor
Re: Assessment of Allura at SourceForge, Dan Eble, 2015/05/22