[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patchy email
From: |
James Lowe |
Subject: |
Re: Patchy email |
Date: |
Mon, 25 May 2015 14:21:52 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 |
On 25/05/15 14:18, David Kastrup wrote:
> address@hidden writes:
>
>> 12:38:14 (UTC) Begin LilyPond compile, previous commit at
>> 2df342bbb164aeb3de0ec17304de90d178f1fd52
>> 12:38:18 test-master-lock and PID entry exist but previous Patchy
>> run (PID 10274) died, resetting test-master-lock anyway.
>> 12:38:19 Merged staging, now at: 2df342bbb164aeb3de0ec17304de90d178f1fd52
>> 12:38:20 Success: ./autogen.sh --noconfigure
>> 12:38:39 Success: /tmp/lilypond-autobuild/configure
>> --enable-checking
>> 12:38:42 Success: nice make clean
>> 12:40:25 *** FAILED BUILD ***
>> nice make -j3 CPU_COUNT=3
>> Previous good commit: 68926767412d644f03b3200058baca5d8c929991
>> Current broken commit: 2df342bbb164aeb3de0ec17304de90d178f1fd52
>> 12:40:25 *** FAILED STEP ***
>> merge from staging
>> Failed runner: nice make -j3 CPU_COUNT=3
>> See the log file log-staging-nice-make--j3-CPU_COUNT=3.txt
>> 12:40:25 Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File
>> "/usr/local/tmp/lilypond-extra/patches/compile_lilypond_test/__init__.py",
>> line 528, in handle_staging
>> self.build (issue_id=issue_id)
>> File
>> "/usr/local/tmp/lilypond-extra/patches/compile_lilypond_test/__init__.py",
>> line 316, in build
>> issue_id)
>> File
>> "/usr/local/tmp/lilypond-extra/patches/compile_lilypond_test/__init__.py",
>> line 266, in runner
>> raise FailedCommand ("Failed runner: %s\nSee the log file %s" %
>> (command, this_logfilename))
>> FailedCommand: Failed runner: nice make -j3 CPU_COUNT=3
>> See the log file log-staging-nice-make--j3-CPU_COUNT=3.txt
>
> Well yes: a patch of mine was not rewritten/rebased to correspond with
> an API change from Dan.
>
> Pushed a fixed variant to staging. I think it's been actually quite
> some time since we had our last breakage in staging...
>
OK that seems to have made it past the make stage.
Patchy-staging is running.
Thanks
James