[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Migrating the Issues DB from Google Code to Savannah
From: |
josiah oberholtzer |
Subject: |
Re: Migrating the Issues DB from Google Code to Savannah |
Date: |
Sun, 2 Aug 2015 15:13:55 -0700 |
On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 4:53 AM, Federico Bruni <address@hidden> wrote:
> Il giorno mer 22 lug 2015 alle 8:23, David Kastrup <address@hidden> ha
> scritto:
>
>> Federico Bruni <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> Il giorno mer 22 lug 2015 alle 0:22, Trevor Daniels
>>> <address@hidden> ha scritto:
>>>
>>>> My conclusion is that we can no longer rely on having a working
>>>> Issues DB at SourceForge before the service at Google Code ceases,
>>>> and must therefore aim to transfer the DB directly to our VM at
>>>> Savannah. Let's hope that the migration works rather better once
>>>> Allura is installed there.
>>>>
>>>> Given these difficulties I think we must now aim to migrate to
>>>> Allura on our VM at Savannah as soon as possible. So where do we
>>>> stand in installing Allura on the VM and in redeveloping our scripts
>>>> to work with Allura? Are Federico and Carl respectively still
>>>> working on these aspects?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I started working on it yesterday. I got stuck while setting up the
>>> web server because I _think_ that there's some server setup, out of
>>> our VM, which redirects any http request to the IP to the welcome page
>>> on chapters.gnu.org
>>>
>>
>> I seem to remember that we only got some odd port punching through to
>> our VM, sharing the IP address with a number of other VM's. So you'll
>> probably need to use a http link including the port number in the
>> browser URL and make Allura listen to that particular port for HTTP
>> requests.
>>
>> Awkward like anything. I don't think that one do port redirections via
>> DNS so we might be stuck with such URLs including a port number for the
>> time being.
>>
>
> I don't think that this is the problem (port 80 should be open), but I
> might try configuring the web server to accept requests on some particular
> port.. but which one? I've already tried 8080, one of the ports we asked to
> keep open (I think), with no success.
>
> Nacho should have the answer but I didn't hear from him in the last 10
> days...
>
>
>> I've asked Nacho of gnu.org to have a look at this asap, explaining
>>> him our urgency. (BTW, I'm going in holidays on 3rd of August..)
>>>
>>> I hope to finish the setup within Sunday. If I get stuck with anything
>>> I'll ask for help also here.
>>>
>>
> I wrote again to Nacho on 27th but no reply. Bad moment, I guess. He might
> be in holidays.
> I'm also in holidays now and I'll probably won't see much my computer in
> the next 3 weeks.
>
> I hope that someone else can take care of the Allura deployment. It turned
> out to be not easy at all. The documentation is not that good. It's
> currently split between the wiki on Sourceforhe and the real manual (built
> with Sphinx) on readthedocs.org
> The installation instructions are only for testing and not for real
> deployments.
>
> Anybody has experience in deploying python applications through wsgi or
> uwsgi?
> I tried nginx + uwsgi but 'm stuck here:
> http://lists.unbit.it/pipermail/uwsgi/2015-July/008104.html
>
> The guys at #allura on freenode (in particular brondsem) will be glad to
> help.
>
>
I have some experience getting Python applications running under WSGI (and
Apache, although I'm happy to learn nginx).
I also have quite a bit of free time for the next few weeks.
Let me know if there's any way I can help with the Allura deployment.
>
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
>
--
Josiah Wolf Oberholtzer, PhD
http://josiahwolfoberholtzer.com