[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: articulate.ly: update documentation, add support for portato (issue
From: |
nine . fierce . ballads |
Subject: |
Re: articulate.ly: update documentation, add support for portato (issue 260040043 by address@hidden) |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Aug 2015 13:35:35 +0000 |
On 2015/08/08 16:27:24, ht wrote:
Hi,
This is a small enhancement which I've had lying around for a while...
Since the
"portato" articulation is nowadays supported when generating MIDI
without using
articulate.ly, there's really no reason why this articulation couldn't
be
supported by articulate.ly as well.
I'm not sure I understand you properly; is the entire motivation for
this change? It sounds like "Because there can be two ways to do
things, there should be."
My response is to question whether it is worth maintaining two ways.
Does articulate.ly somehow disable the built-in articulations? If so,
shouldn't the goal be to make them work together rather than to enlarge
them separately?
Regards,
Dan
https://codereview.appspot.com/260040043/
- Re: articulate.ly: update documentation, add support for portato (issue 260040043 by address@hidden), ht . lilypond . development, 2015/08/08
- Re: articulate.ly: update documentation, add support for portato (issue 260040043 by address@hidden),
nine . fierce . ballads <=
- Re: articulate.ly: update documentation, add support for portato (issue 260040043 by address@hidden), ht . lilypond . development, 2015/08/09
- Re: articulate.ly: update documentation, add support for portato (issue 260040043 by address@hidden), nine . fierce . ballads, 2015/08/09
- Re: articulate.ly: update documentation, add support for portato (issue 260040043 by address@hidden), pkx166h, 2015/08/26