[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker
|
From: |
Trevor Daniels |
|
Subject: |
Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker |
|
Date: |
Wed, 2 Sep 2015 10:27:35 +0100 |
Federico Bruni wrote Wednesday, September 02, 2015 10:15 AM
> Yes, but I was thinking about using an interim solution for some months
> to have some more time to evaluate the self-hosted solutions.
> Sourceforge would not be the best interim solution.
I think you first need to prove our DB with 4000-odd
records can be imported from GC to GitHub by doing it.
Trevor
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, (continued)
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Trevor Daniels, 2015/09/02
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Federico Bruni, 2015/09/02
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Simon Albrecht, 2015/09/02
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Federico Bruni, 2015/09/02
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Simon Albrecht, 2015/09/02
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Federico Bruni, 2015/09/02
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Federico Bruni, 2015/09/02
- Re: thinking twice about the new issue tracker, Federico Bruni, 2015/09/03