[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ties within chords inconsistency
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Ties within chords inconsistency |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Sep 2015 22:40:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Joram <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Simon,
>
> I see. The difference is: I would not have expected that to work. But I
> can see the benefit if it would, now.
Sigh. It works perfectly. Per-chord ties don't magically turn into
in-chord ties, but if you really need in-chord ties, nobody keeps you
from writing them as such. You can still rearrange the resulting music
with << >>.
For example, it is perfectly feasible to write
<< { a'4 ~ a' } { c'' c'' } >> or
<< { a'4 a' } { c'' ~ c'' } >> or
<< { a'4 a' } { c'' c'' } { <>~ \skip 2 } >>
and have all that arranged into the equivalent of { <a' c''>4 ~ <a' c''> }
or to write
<< { <a'~>4 a' } { <c''~> c'' } >> or
and have that rearranged into
{ <a'~ c''~>4 <a' c''> }
Take your choice.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Ties within chords inconsistency, Simon Albrecht, 2015/09/09
- Re: Ties within chords inconsistency, David Kastrup, 2015/09/09
- Re: Ties within chords inconsistency, Joram, 2015/09/09
- Re: Ties within chords inconsistency, Simon Albrecht, 2015/09/09
- Re: Ties within chords inconsistency, Joram, 2015/09/09
- Re: Ties within chords inconsistency,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Ties within chords inconsistency, Joram, 2015/09/09
- Re: Ties within chords inconsistency, David Kastrup, 2015/09/09
- Re: Ties within chords inconsistency, Joram, 2015/09/09
- Re: Ties within chords inconsistency, David Kastrup, 2015/09/09
- Re: Ties within chords inconsistency, Simon Albrecht, 2015/09/09
- Re: Ties within chords inconsistency, David Kastrup, 2015/09/09
- Re: Ties within chords inconsistency, Simon Albrecht, 2015/09/09
- Re: Ties within chords inconsistency, Simon Albrecht, 2015/09/09
- Re: Ties within chords inconsistency, David Kastrup, 2015/09/10