[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ly:moment<=? ??
From: |
David Nalesnik |
Subject: |
Re: ly:moment<=? ?? |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Dec 2015 19:23:42 -0600 |
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 7:08 PM, Simon Albrecht <address@hidden>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> while getting to terms with the accidentalStyle code I found that it would
> be useful (currently only for dodecaphonic-no-repeat-rule,
> scm/music-functions.scm:line 1682f.) to have a ly:moment<=? Scheme
> predicate function. It’s easy to do in Scheme:
>
> (define (ly:moment<=? a b)
> (or (equal? a b)
> (ly:moment<? a b)))
>
> but I see that the ly:moment<? procedure is defined in
> lily/moment-scheme.cc.
> Do you think it’s worth it to generally provide such a procedure? Or just
> define it locally in music-functions.scm?
>
>
It has already been provided: see moment<=? in scm/lily-library,scm.
David
- ly:moment<=? ??, Simon Albrecht, 2015/12/20
- Re: ly:moment<=? ??,
David Nalesnik <=