Re: Web: Review GSoC page (issue 285400043 by address@hidden)

[git]

https://codereview.appspot.com/285400043/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi
File Documentation/web/community.itexi (right):

https://codereview.appspot.com/285400043/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode909
Documentation/web/community.itexi:909: anyone who is interested in
developing LilyPond.
On 2016/02/06 20:53:30, pwm wrote:
> Why don't we just shorten this paragraph to:

> Below is a list of suggested projects for GSoC or for anyone who is
interested
> in developing LilyPond.  (Last updated: February 2016)

Done.

https://codereview.appspot.com/285400043/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode916
Documentation/web/community.itexi:916: you're welcome to suggest it.
On 2016/02/06 20:53:31, pwm wrote:
> How about simplifying this paragraph to:

> If you have ideas for a GSoC project that is not listed below, please
send us an
> email on our developer mailing list (see @ref{Contact}).  There are a
number of
> areas where LilyPond could be improved, and our development team is
always
> willing to help those who would like to tackle a project like those
listed
> below.

Done.

https://codereview.appspot.com/285400043/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode925
Documentation/web/community.itexi:925: case.
On 2016/02/06 20:53:30, pwm wrote:
> This should come before the text about the sourceforge list, otherwise
which
> list does it refer to?  It would probably go best before the text
about other
> projects that are not on the project list.  I would suggest rewording
it as
> follows:

> Mentor availability varies from project to project and from year to
year.  Send
> us an email on our developer mailing list (see @ref{Contact}), and we
will help
> you find a mentor for a project that fits your interests and skills.


Done with some adjustments.

https://codereview.appspot.com/285400043/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode1088
Documentation/web/community.itexi:1088: project from 2015.
On 2016/02/06 20:53:32, pwm wrote:
> I would shorten to:

> There are several possibilities for this project, including building
upon the
> MusicXML export project from GSoC 2015.

Done.

https://codereview.appspot.com/285400043/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode1091
Documentation/web/community.itexi:1091: @strong{Requirements:} MusicXML,
Python, (Scheme), basic LilyPond knowledge
On 2016/02/06 20:53:32, pwm wrote:
> (Scheme) --> Scheme

Done.

https://codereview.appspot.com/285400043/diff/1/Documentation/web/community.itexi#newcode1107
Documentation/web/community.itexi:1107: achievements with regard to
LilyPond's default output quality.
On 2016/02/06 20:53:30, pwm wrote:
> I don't think this is needed.  It breaks out of the pattern of just
describing
> the project and gets into editorializing about its comparative worth
relative to
> other projects, or even how rewarding it would be.  Maybe someone
would find
> another project more rewarding?  Seems like this is better suited for
a
> conversation with a student.

Hm, my intention was to draw the attention to the fact that this project
relates to actual engraving quality. But I've taken your suggestion.

https://codereview.appspot.com/285400043/