[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rewriting the Translator definition framework
|
From: |
Paul Morris |
|
Subject: |
Re: Rewriting the Translator definition framework |
|
Date: |
Sat, 23 Apr 2016 01:09:43 -0400 |
> On Apr 22, 2016, at 8:07 AM, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> I am currently doing pitch 2 at first-class Scheme engravers and am
> sorely tempted to scratch the whole macro-based mess and do it via
> inheritance and templates.
I can’t comment on the implementation questions, but it will be great to have
first-class scheme engravers. So thanks for working on this! (Also, while I’m
at it, your recent dotted list work, allowing "violin.1” etc, is also really
nice.)
-Paul