[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: compiling lilypond fails

From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: compiling lilypond fails
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 16:25:17 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux)

Knut Petersen <address@hidden> writes:

> Am 25.06.2016 um 10:36 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Ok, issue 4903 is now in master. What's the news on make -k output
>> now? Does applying the last patch (the one with ENGRAVER_INHERIT in
>> its title) make any difference in the amount of reported errors? 
> address@hidden:~/sources/lily> ../mklily
> Building lilypond 01cf114a7808fb0d519d0619f6f56c524ce60399... this
> will take some time ;-)
> exec ./ --noconfigure in /home/knut/sources/lily
> ... succeeded after 0 seconds
> exec ../configure --prefix=/home/knut/sources/lilybisect/ in
> /home/knut/sources/lily/build ... succeeded after 5 seconds
> exec make -k -j 11 CPU_COUNT=11 all in /home/knut/sources/lily/build
> ... succeeded after 71 seconds
> exec make -j 11 CPU_COUNT=11 install in /home/knut/sources/lily/build
> ... succeeded after 2 seconds
> exec make -j 11 CPU_COUNT=11 doc in /home/knut/sources/lily/build
> ... succeeded after 795 seconds
> exec make -j 11 CPU_COUNT=11 install-doc in
> /home/knut/sources/lily/build ... succeeded after 4 seconds
> Total lilypond build time: 877 seconds
> So everything looks fine again.

Not with my current patch-in-progress.  g++-4.8 seems to do some kind of
"overloading resolution" by just randomly picking a candidate from
several it fails to distinguish and then complaining when it does not
fit.  The errors I am getting seem sort of arbitrary regarding the
failing template argument candidates.

David Kastrup

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]