[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GSoC] spanners project update

From: Urs Liska
Subject: Re: [GSoC] spanners project update
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 14:58:52 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1

Am 30.06.2016 um 14:47 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Urs Liska <address@hidden> writes:
>> Am 30.06.2016 um 14:37 schrieb David Kastrup:
>>> How does that differ from symbols?
>> Ah, not in the Scheme domain, of course. But you can't *enter* them as
>> LilyPond code, isn't it?
> Can you give an example for symbols "entered as LilyPond code" as
> opposed to "in the Scheme domain"?

Ah, I mean

#(define %9sn5@ "a")
%9sn5@ = "a"

but ...

> Do you mean "without using #" here?  Why would it be relevant to XML how
> you entered a symbol?

of course that doesn't matter here as you can always write

\override = #'09fjwg@

Well, *now* it doesn't work because it expects a string, but it's not
the symbol restriction.
Sorry for the noise.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]