[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-2.0 and debian
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: guile-2.0 and debian |
Date: |
Sat, 12 Nov 2016 15:42:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>> The main problem I remember was a coding problem. It did not like
>> working with UTF-8 characters.
>
>
> Do you mean the encoding-problem is responsible for the failed
> markup-cyclic-reference.ly?
Very unlikely.
> Or for the stuck while doc-building?
Possibly but also unlikely. I remembered straightforward errors when
using files with UTF-8 characters in them (and there were a number).
And the file for demonstrating &oe; and similar HTML characters turned
out wrong. No error I think, just wrong.
--
David Kastrup
- guile-2.0 and debian, Federico Bruni, 2016/11/07
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/07
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/12
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/13
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/13
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/13
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/14
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/14
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/14