[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-2.0 and debian
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: guile-2.0 and debian |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Nov 2016 00:44:07 +0100 |
2016-11-18 0:24 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley <address@hidden>:
> 2016-11-17 13:05 GMT+01:00 Antonio Ospite <address@hidden>:
> Hi Antonio,
>
> as said, no time to dive in deeper, though here some observations (my
> test-file attached.)
Aaargh, I pasted
input/regression/markup-cyclic-reference.ly
into atest-40.ly for testings, but forgot to delete it before posting
the file, disregard this part of the file, please.
Cheers,
Harm
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, (continued)
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/14
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/17
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/17
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/17
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/19
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/17
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian,
Thomas Morley <=
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/19
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/19
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/19
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/19
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/19
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/20
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/20
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/21
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/21
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/22