[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: guile-2.0 and debian
From: |
Antonio Ospite |
Subject: |
Re: guile-2.0 and debian |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Nov 2016 22:35:41 +0100 |
On Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:25:39 +0100
Thomas Morley <address@hidden> wrote:
[...]
> Have a look at input/regression/markup-special-characters.ly
> Compiling it as standalone is fine even with -dbackend=eps, but it
> comes out wrongly in the regtests for both pdf and html.
>
This could have happened because the whole build process overrides
LANG, so in the standalone compilation the output looks OK but when
lilypond is run by "make" it ignores the locale from the environment,
and so wide characters get substituted.
Instead of patching the python script I took a more drastic approach
for now:
https://ao2.it/tmp/lilypond-guile2/patches_2016-11-22/0014-XXX-don-t-override-LANG-globally-in-the-build-proces.patch
The full patch-set is here:
https://ao2.it/tmp/lilypond-guile2/patches_2016-11-22
The patches are to be applied on top of release/2.19.51-1.
I am not sure that patch 0015 is strictly needed, my working dir might
have been in a dirty state when I come up with it to fix a build
failure. I'll try without it on my next full rebuild.
Anyway, with all the patches applied "make doc-stage-1" and "make doc"
seem to work, and the output seems acceptable too: I can see unicode
characters in the html output (out-www/offline-root/index.html).
I'll take a look at "make test" soon.
Ciao,
Antonio
--
Antonio Ospite
https://ao2.it
https://twitter.com/ao2it
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, (continued)
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/21
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/21
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/21
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/21
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/21
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/22
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/22
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/22
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian,
Antonio Ospite <=
- Message not available
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Federico Bruni, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, David Kastrup, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Antonio Ospite, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Federico Bruni, 2016/11/23
- Re: guile-2.0 and debian, Thomas Morley, 2016/11/23